Iceland and the IMF

Why is a bank, an International Bank, allowed to determine the fate of an entire country? According to yesterdays newspaper article, the IMF is FORCING Iceland to raise it's key interest rate by 6 full percentage points. Somehow I get the feeling that this will not be very good for their economy.

I did a little research on Iceland and found out that they are not a member of the European Union. It seems that until just recently, Iceland's economy was doing just fine. They did not have any real reason or incentive to join the European Union. Now all of a sudden the entire country is on the verge of bankruptcy. I think high interest rates had something to do with their economic problems.

I'm not quite sure how raising interest rates even higher is going to help their economy. In fact, my guess is that it will make it worse. But the good news is, due to their economic havoc, they may reconsider their decision to join the European Union. Hmmmm!

OPPOSING THE NEW WORLD ORDER

What happens when you oppose the New World Order agenda of the global elite? Well, if you are the the leader of a small nation like Panama, then the globalists call on one of their enforcers (Bush Sr.) who invades your country, kills thousands of unarmed, innocent, unsuspecting civilians, kidnaps you and brings you back to America to stand trial for drug dealing. Never mind that there is not, and never was any evidence. Just disregard the fact that you may be an independent sovereign nation. None of that matters to war mongering Skull and Bones members like George H. W. Bush or his war mongering Skull and Bones son George W. Bush, either for that matter. If you do not cooperate with the globalists' plans for a One World Government and One World Economic System, you will be taught a lesson and fall into line, one way or another.

That is exactly what happened on December 19, 1989 when the U.S. government invaded Panama under the pretext of fighting "The War on Drugs." They were unsuccessful in overthrowing the government of Panama by economic sanctions and seizures of assets for two or three years prior to the invasion. The goal of the invasion was to replace the government of Panama with a leader who was more willing to cooperate with the New World Order agenda. More specifically, the U.S wanted to renege on a 1977 Treaty with Panama and Noriega refused their "offer".

I am currently reading a book called The U.S. Invasion of Panama, The Truth Behind Operation "Just Cause", by The Independent Commission of Inquiry on the U.S. Invasion of Panama. The book highlights many atrocities committed by U.S. troops as well as U.S. government officials. I will list some of the findings of The Commission.

-As the Report of The Commission shows, from 1,000 to 4,000 Panamanians were killed, thousands more were wounded, and more than 20,000 found themselves homeless. Once again the executive branch of the U.S. government, headed by the president, had taken upon itself to launch a war not authorized by Congress.(page 1)

-The Commission found all of Bush's justifications to be lies and deception, believed by no one in the U.S. government, and meant simply to gain support from the U.S. public, which disapproved of intervention in Central America. (page 5)

-Then came the unprecedented step of kidnapping a sovereign country's head of state to stand trial in a U.S. court that has no jurisdiction over him and not a shred of legal grounds for it's actions (page 7)

-Of course the invasion of Panama violated international law. One nation cannot invade another nation because of it's displeasure with policies, or leadership there. Of course it violated the laws of the United States. We cannot under our law deploy military force in time of peace; killing civilians at the whim of the executive. (page 12)

-In preparation for the coup, we we had followed the normal procedure in demonizing, as occured with General Noriega, the person we wanted removed. This we did through paid agents in the local media and through political forces that we financed. We also falsified documents that compromised our enemies and made certain that they were published. (page16)

-The headlines demonizing General Noriega were designed to psychologically prepare the population for the need to send U.S. GIs to kill and be killed.(page 19)

-Ample evidence reveals that the U.S. government and the Pentagon planned to overthrow the Panamanian government and replace it with a dependent and subservient regime(s) which would renegotiate the key provisions of the 1977 Panama Canal Treaties. (page 19)

-an embargoed Panama found itself unable to pay debt service on loans from The International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank and others. (page 23)

-The Bush Administration quarantining of U.S. reporters so that they would be unable to witness and record the worst of the carnage in Panama indicated just how much it wanted the people in the United States kept ignorant of the brutal nature of the war. (page 27)

-Nine of the ten doctors on duty at Santo Tomas hospital at the time of the invasion were soon fired, arrested or in hiding after being labeled "Noriega supporters." The United States knew that their first hand testimonies would be powerful rebuttal to U.S. propaganda about the "clean" and almost "casualty-free" nature of the invasion. (page 28)

-Thousands of Panamanians were killed and wounded during the invasion. The bulk of these casualties were civilians. Estimates of the numbers killed range from over 1,000 to as many as 4,000. A precise figure is hard to arrive at because the U.S. government has carried out a deliberate and systematic cover-up of the numbers killed. (page 34)

-Many of the dead were brought in with no marks except a single shot fired into one eye, indicating extra-judicial executions. (page 39)

-U.S. media accounts of the invasion read like Pentagon press releases...there is not a single public photograph, video or eyewitness account of the moments when 23 U.S. servicemen were killed and 265 wounded...the U.S. media pool of reporters and camera people, who had been taken to Panama by the Pentagon, were locked up for two days and barred from going to the scene of the fighting (page 41)

- The Independent Commission of Inquiry has received numerous individual testimonies, collected by human rights organizations of people who witnessed U.S. troops using flamethrowers to incinerate corpses on the street in the days following the invasion. (page 43)

-fear of retaliation constitutes one of the greatest obstacles to getting a full accounting of the dead (page 45)

DOES THIS SOUND LIKE THE COUNTRY THAT YOU KNOW AND LOVE? Reading this book makes me want to throw up. Unfortunately this was not an isolated event. Every war in your lifetime tells a similar tale but you will never hear it on the 6:00 news or read it in your local newspaper. Try reading a book or researching the National Security Archives, supplement your only source of (dis)information. It will probably take you out of your comfort zone. Otherwise you will never understand what is happening to this country.

The New Economic Disorder

The New Economic Disorder
Posted 10/27/2008 3:19 PM EDT on democratandchronicle.com

I just finished rereading The New Economic Disorder written by Larry Bates, who is a former bank president as well as former legislator from the Tennessee House of Representatives. Mr. Bates' book offers much insight into the monetary problems that we are suffering from today. Although the book was written in 1994, it reads like today's headlines.
One of the first things that Mr. Bates points out to the reader is his own difficulty that he had in understanding how the economy works, despite the fact that he was an economics major in school. "I can truthfully say my own biggest obstacle to understanding economics was my formal training in it." This is not surprising when you are taught that the economy is supposed to function on several natural laws. The truth is, according to Mr. Bates, "The peaks and valleys, booms and busts in the economy...all those "opportunities to profit"... are actually the result of deliberate policy actions by policy makers in the government and the Federal Reserve. Simply put, there is a small group of people in this country and around the world who have the resources and the power to determine the direction our economy will take. They choose which investments will prosper and which will fail. That's how they transfer wealth out of your pocket, while knowing where the next profits will occur enables them to put the same money in their pockets."

I have known this for a very long time. I choose to call these people the "Illuminati". I realize that you have probably never heard of this word before but under the circumstances it may be worth looking up.

Mr. Bates goes on to say in reference to the Federal Reserve inflating the currency and increasing the money supply with new money and credit, "This is nothing more than a system of bondage that keeps the borrower always in debt to the bankers because of a dishonest system of banking, money and credit."

The Bible says it best. "The borrower is servant to the lender" (Proverbs 22:7)

The book gives a very interesting example of how compound interest works in relation to regular interest.

"One dollar loaned out at the time of the birth of Christ at 3% compound interest would be a debt of $19,342,814,713,834,066,795,298,816. At 6% interest, it would be $2,075,564,540,495,770,000,659,356,622,933,159,968,008,080,198,784. At simple interest, the interest would be$59 and $118, respectively."

Are you beginning to get the picture yet?

An open Letter to Sandra Frankel, Brighton Town Supervisor

An open letter to Sandra Frankel, Brighton town Supervisor
Posted 10/26/2008 6:17 PM EDT on democratandchronicle.com

A Question of Discernment
I fully recognize your right as an individual to use the Democrat and Chronicle Blog to endorse any candidate of your choice, but as an elected official, I also felt a compelling obligation as a citizen to question your discernment. You mention that you campaigned in Scranton, Ohio for Presidential candidate John Kerry in 2004. This statement is made as if it were a “badge of honor”. I have only one question for you, HAVE YOU EVER HEARD OF THE SATANIC FRATERNITY CALLED THE “SKULL AND BONES” ? John Kerry is a known member of this organization. There are only 2 possible answers to this question. Either answer you choose raises questions as to your discernment and will necessitate a further explanation, which is obviously the purpose of my blog.

If your answer is no, then you would appear to be guilty of endorsing a political candidate for only the shallow reason that you share the same political party affiliation and that you couldn’t be bothered to find out even a minimal amount of information about your candidate before you endorse or campaign for him. This raises serious questions about your discernment.

If your answer is yes, then either you don’t believe the overwhelming amount of information about the Skull and Bones fraternity or you have chosen to disregard it as if membership in a Satanic Fraternity has no bearing on holding public office. If you claim the information about the satanic “Skull and Bones” fraternity is untrue or irrelevant, then you also have some explaining to do.

John Kerry was asked on national television about his membership in the “Skull and Bones”, click here to view is his response. Don’t you find this answer slightly odd given the severity of the accusation? Perhaps you care to explain how such a relatively small Fraternal organization produces three presidents, another presidential candidate and an unusually large amount of other government officials in influential positions despite the fact that the odds of mathematical probability would make this extremely unlikely if not impossible. Perhaps you feel that having “personal character” is not a prerequisite to holding an elected public office. Either way, your complete lack of knowledge or your complete lack of concern on this subject, (the Skull and Bones Satanic Fraternal Organization), raises serious questions about your discernment.

The Election

THE "ELECTION"
Posted 10/20/2008 4:24 PM EDT on democratandchronicle.com

Get over it already. It makes absolutely no difference whatsoever who wins this election. Your life is not going to change one bit no matter who wins. It will not be any better if your candidate wins or any worse if your candidate loses. The President of the United States does not have the authority to make any decision on his own that will affect your life. He will do exactly what he is told to do.

The outcome of this election has already been decided by people you have never even heard of. If you want to know who runs this country and every other country on the planet, follow the money. Find out who the international bankers are. Find out who owns the Federal Reserve, the IMF and the World Bank. Find out who this country owes $10 Trillion dollars to. Find out who collects $500 billion in interest EVERY YEAR from the US Government. Find out who controls the IMF (International Monetary Fund), these people can make entire countries change their laws as a precondition to getting necessary loans to keep their countries solvent.

The shadow government gives you a choice of two candidates that THEY PICKED NOT YOU. They will let you pick one of them so you can feel like you had a choice. In the last election you were allowed to choose from Skull and Bones member George Bush or Skull and Bones member John Kerry. Either way, the Skull and Bones won the Presidency. Usually you get the normal choice between two CFR members.

If you never heard of the CFR, the Skull and Bones or the IMF, it is probably because you watch too much TV. If your only source of information comes from either the TV or the newspaper, you are probably not qualified to vote anyway. You don't even have an opinion that you can call your own. The only thing you are qualified to do is regurgitate one or the other party lines.

This election is rather insignificant compared to the current financial crisis, which neither candidate can fix. When the "world leaders" meet sometime in the next couple of weeks to revise the Bretton Woods system that was devised in 1944, you will discover what is really important. They will not care who is President either as long as it is one of their own. If you think you have taken a financial beating in the last couple of weeks, wait a couple more and see what happens.

WORLD DOMINATION

IF I WERE A CORRUPT POLITICIAN, HELL BENT ON RULING THE WORLD, I WOULD CONTROL THE PEOPLE LIKE THIS


Alcoholism, Annihilation of the privileges of the non-elite aristocracy, among other topics.

The propagation of ideas, such as Darwinism, Marxism, Nietzsche-ism, Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Anarchism, and Utopianism, with the task of undermining established forms of order.

Materialism

World government

World wars

Staging catastrophes against one's own people, then claiming a moral high ground for leverage (False flag)

Universal suffrage

Curtailment of civil liberties with the excuse of defeating the enemies of peace

Creating the impression of the existence of freedom of press, freedom of speech, human rights and democracy, all of which are subsequently undermined and become mere illusions or deceptive smokescreens behind which actual oppression lies

Distractions

Pornographic literature

The destruction of Christianity, Islam and other religions and cultures, followed by a transitional stage of atheism, followed finally by the hegemony of Judaism

Brainwashing

Economic depressions

Undermining financial systems by foreign loans, creating national bankruptcy, destroying money markets and replacing them with government credit institutions

Justification of previous acts of evil and expectation of a great new society

Reduction of the manufacture of articles of luxury, destruction of large manufacturers, prohibition of alcohol and hashish, unleashing forces of violence under the mask of principles of freedom,

OIL $50 A BARREL

OIL, $50 A BARREL
Posted 10/9/2008 8:10 PM EDT on democratandchronicle.com

"Bulging inventory depresses oil price", or so says this morning's headlines. Don't be so sure. According to this morning's Democrat and Chronicle, the price of oil fell again to $88.95 a barrel, down from a high of $147 a barrel in July. To the average uninformed "Joe Six-Pack", this seems like just an unforeseen fortuitous bonus, what the newspaper calls "A rare dose of good news for the consumer". Supposedly the demand for oil is down causing bulging inventories, driving the price down. Bull Sh%#!

The price of oil has nothing to do with supply and demand! There is no oil shortage and there never was. There are huge oil reserves in several other locations other than the Middle East.

Lindsey Williams, author of The Energy Non-Crisis, predicted over two months ago that oil would fall to $50 a barrel. He was saying this when oil was at its peak and still rising. According to Mr. Williams, it wasn't really a prediction, it was a recounting of what he had heard and saw himself while he was the chaplain on the Alaskan Oil Pipeline. Check out this website where Lindsey discusses oil prices and inside information concerning an expected collapse of the U.S. economy.

http://whitewraithe.wordpress.com/2008/08/04/chaplain-lindsey-williams-reveals-to-alex-jones-planned-economic-collapse-of-us/

The HIDDEN History of 9-11

The HIDDEN History of 9-11
Posted 10/7/2008 4:39 PM EDT on democratandchronicle.com

The HIDDEN History of 9-11 is the latest book written on the 9-11 tragedy. Last night I was fortunate enough to meet and talk to Paul Zarembka, who is the editor and a contributor to the book. Paul is currently an economics professor at The University of Buffalo. Other contributors to the book are also professors at various colleges, and one is the Executive director of the Institute for Policy Research and Development in London.

Mr. Zarembka was the guest speaker at a "Scripture In The News" class hosted by a friend of mine at First Bible Baptist Church, on the first Monday of each month at 7PM. Paul spoke for approximately 90 minutes then answered questions. The gist of the the discussion as well as the book was that there are major discrepancies in the governments version of events on 9-11, and that more than half of the "original 19 hijackers" have turned up "alive" somewhere.

This was actually no new revelation for me, but it was refreshing to see that there are intellectuals actually discussing and researching the events of 9-11. Mr. Zarembka made it very clear that he was not a "conspiracy theorist", but did point out the fact that no matter which way you look at it, the events of 9-11 are the direct results of a "Conspiracy". The only difference is which conspiracy you believe.The more that you educate yourself, the more improbable the governments version of events is.

Somebody PLEASE Explain It To Me

Somebody PLEASE Explain It To Me
Posted 10/4/2008 8:27 AM EDT on democratandchronicle.com

Now that the $700 + BILLION Bailout bill has passed, can someone please explain it to me. The only thing I've heard all week in the controlled news (TV, newspapers, Time and Newsweek), is that if the bill does not pass , things will be much worse. The other mantras currently being regurgitated are " BAILOUT=Easy Loans" for Joe Schmoe average home owner and "We need to ease the credit market."
Says Who?, The politicians who don't understand (BECAUSE THEY DON'T READ) what they are voting on? or the rich corporate thieves who have already stolen your money once and will now benefit again? Why should we ease the money markets making loans easier to get? Isn't that what got us in trouble to begin with?

Someone please explain to me the correlation between the government adding another TRILLION DOLLARS onto our national debt and my ability to get an auto loan. Why would the money markets loosen their lending standards because we borrow another trillion that we can't pay back. I have always had to prove to the bank that I have the ability to pay back a loan as a PRECONDITION of obtaining that loan. How does the BAILOUT change that?

The government does not have the money for the bailout, they have to borrow it. What is the difference who owes the money?, neither the government nor these "failed" corporations have any intention of paying it back, primarily because neither has the ABILITY to pay it back. If you already owe $8 TRILLION, then you borrow another $ 1Trillion, are you better or worse off financialy than you were?

Why would these money markets be less likely to lend me money if there was no bailout?

The truth is that even the financial experts don't understand it nor can than they explain it. They didn't even attempt to explain it. There is no "formula" to explain the market because THEY MAKE IT UP AS THEY GO ALONG